Friday, 6 September 2013


PAINTING 2: Mixed Media

Part 1 – Physical and Visual Texture

Creating Visual Texture using Dark and Light Tones


I found it easier, rather than pinning textures to a board, to lay them on a board on the floor.  I wanted to include some hard round objects, i.e. stones to contrast with the other rather soft items. Having de-cluttered in my move last year I don’t have a garage full of bits and bobs although I have been trying to build up a collection of things I thought might be useful, which I keep in boxes in my studio.

Rather than use white cartridge paper, I felt it would be good to use a toned pastel paper in a deep plum.  I have used this before and find it is good for black and white as it contrasts with both.  My picture is approximately A3.  The soft pencil did not show up much so I pretty well stuck to charcoal a bit  of pastel and white chalk.  I enjoyed the exercise as it made me think about tone in terms of texture, rather than merely form.  The placement of the items was purely random but it still ended up with a satisfying (for me anyway) composition. 
 
 

The initials, top right, were practice signatures on the back of a cardboard box, and is reminiscent of the use of lettering and name initials as used by Antoni Tapies, as well as effectively being a signature for the piece of work. There’s a crumpled Sainsbury bag top left and various other things including string, fun foam leftover, canvas stretcher pegs, dried flowers, sacking, bubble wrap, clear cellophane, towelling, oasis foam, crumpled paper and a couple of lids.  I have often found in the past when setting up a still life, it is best done without too much manipulation, otherwise it tends to look contrived.  I hope this composition has remained spontaneous and interesting.

I think I am learning when to stop without involving myself in too much detail and overwork.  The exercise required a number of overlaid textures and I believe this is what I have achieved without becoming too cluttered. I quite liked the face which is lurking with the wonky teeth and Poirot moustache !

Tuesday, 3 September 2013


PAINTING 2: Mixed Media

Part 1 – Physical and Visual Texture

 
Project: Visual Texture of Paint – Research
 

The two artists I have chosen to explore in relation to the visual texture of paint are Peter Doig (1959 - ) and Edouard Vuillard (1868-11940)

I would like to start by mentioning the following two quotes, the first from Vuillard and the second from Marcel Proust.  Vuillard painted familiar scenes and interiors and Doig painted what he regards as incidents (as opposed to accidents) things he regarded as part of someone else’s experience.

 ‘Why is it in the familiar places that the mind and the sensibility find the greatest degree of genuine novelty?’ 1

Marcel Proust: ‘As habit [or familiarity] weakens every impression, what a person recalls to us most vividly is precisely what we had forgotten, because it was of no importance and [we] had therefore left [it] in full possession of its strength’ 2
 

It seems that both painters feel that familiar events and things in life are the most interesting.  In painting the ‘familiar’ the artist also taps into the collective sub conscious that Jung talks of, and in doing so their subject matter automatically resonates with the observer because of that ubiquitous familiarity.

In terms of style, however, their styles differ yet in terms of the visual mark making technique, they are similar.  Doig uses oil as his medium and his compositional style often includes the triple horizontal division of landscape painting to reveal something considered mystical and sometimes sinister.


The House that Jack Built depicts the central motif, the house as highly textured with coloured bricks, black face like windows and white trees offering a tracery screen which is so familiar in Doig’s work.  Above and below are textured elements which form a type of shutter and Doig felt that they look as though they might close and erase the central motif.  The colours used are predominantly red which gives the house a sinister look. We are left wondering what happened here, was it a druggy den, the venue for a murder, or a house that ended up as a ruin through adverse financial circumstances? Perhaps alluding to a final unwritten line in the nursery rhyme.

Doig uses overpainting, grattination, what looks like sponging, dripping, smearing, perhaps chalking, but he does not use the texture of the paint, but defines the texture using these techniques. The rhythmic brickwork in the bottom third is worked over smudged and dripped paint. The top third is abstract and is predominantly a mixture of red and black marks, possibly sponged.

Another of Doig’s paintings which illustrates the use of mark making as texture is demonstrated in his painting Swamped, oil on canvas of 1990.

Colour is used to dramatic effect and broken tree stumps cover the swamp.  A tracery of white trees on the right overlays a moon. The frequently used canoe motif is painted in smooth white paint to present a ghostly appearance.  The rendition of the painting again asks a question, is that a body slumped in the canoe or just some provisions, why is the canoe floating un-tethered?  The texture and colour provides the drama and gives us clues.  Doig’s paint is frequently thinned down considerably, so there is no impasto employed. Doig uses, tracery, spattering, mottling, sweeps and layering to produce visual texture, which in this painting is only relieved by the canoe itself, which is depicted in plain white paint.  Doig often used white paint either in outline or as blobs of paint and has become known as “snow”. He frequently using it as a screen beyond which the subject of the painting appears.
 

Vuillard, who was painting approximately one hundred years prior to Doig, uses visual texture in similar ways to Doig, and employs lateral and vertical divisions. He was one of the Nabi artists along with people such as Bonnard, Maurice Denis, and Roussel, whose work was very similar, using visual pattern and tone as texture.


Vuillard uses the tracery of tree branches in much the same way as Doig, his patches of sunlight are also just that, patches rendered flat in yellow and green small marks.  He also uses tree trunks as a compositional device as Doig does, some of which are textured.  The texture of the boys linen shirt on the left is almost criss-crossed in white, his trousers are plain black with no modelling, as are the distant ladies silhouettes. There is also a slight suggestion of the “snow” effect often seen in Doig paintings. He relies on tonal affects to indicate the sunlit patches and shadows.

Where Vuillard differs is in the expression of the subject, it is not sinister, more amusing as the two boys perhaps hide from their nanny.  Also Vuillard used a mixture of distemper and glue, or à la colle,3 not oil paint and leaves it unvarnished and therefore matt. Vuillard would scrape this off if it became too thick.

In Dressmaker’s Workshop of 1892 Vuillard treats us to a confection of texture and mark making in the dresses, the wallpaper and the floor, indeed they almost become abstract, just as Doig’s work hovers on the line between abstraction and representation.


The extensive mark making is offset by the occasional plain unmodulated black, as in the bodice of the lady on the left, which is a counter-change against the white door behind. The tone of the colours adds to the interest and contrasts with the patterns on the canvas that is divided vertically giving rhythm to the painting, accentuated by the stripes on the dress second from the right. It is a feast of visual texture. The scene was undoubtedly a familiar one at the time and there is no suggestion of the mysterious, just an everyday scene. The “familiar” subject was something that both artists considered to be an area with the most interest.

 

 

 

 



1 Quote by Vuillard, Renoir Fine Art Inc.
2 p31 Peter  Doig edited by Judith Nesbitt with essay by Richard Shiff, Tate Publishing 2008
3 Vuillard by John Russell Thames and Hudson 1971

Monday, 12 August 2013


PAINTING 2: Mixed Media

Part 1 – Physical and Visual Texture

Project: Physical Texture of Paint, Exercises (4)

 
I wanted to try to paint four different styles of painting under this heading and chose, realism, semi-abstraction and abstraction and expressionism.

The first of the four exercises was a realistic painting of sunlight, candle and spirit light, so I called it Light.  I wanted to explore colour with a muted palette as well as texture so this subject afforded that opportunity.  Each of the paintings is on A3 paper over which I have painted gesso with a large house brush to give as much texture as possible.

 I used acrylic paint and didn’t follow any particular artists style but just used palette knife to explore the different textures in the painting.  The wax candle was very smooth, the wooden wall textured with knots and grain, there is the small edge of a wicker basket a carpet and the clay pot in the background which had pattern marks on it.  I don’t know why but I couldn’t help thinking of Cailebotte’s Scrapers, probably because of the perspective, floor and wood.




I felt in my comfort zone with this style of painting it is what I have been wanting to achieve in my work, i.e. less attention to detail and I felt I really learned a new technique with this image.  I painted it in my summer house on a really hot day.  I realize that I should do more preparation sketches, which is quite unnatural to me,  I prefer to work straight off to retain the spontaneity.  However, I did produce a sketch in my notebook which was to hand. I had to decide on the shadows as they were gradually moving round and affecting the
composition.





My second piece was influenced by the artist Pia Fries, I love what she does with paint and the way she works it into shapes which work in their own right.

 

I couldn’t begin to find ways of achieving this technique and eventually got side tracked into doing my own thing.  I will make further attempts in the future, but the amount of paint required is a bit off-putting. Also I suspect I would need to use some different kinds of applicators other than a syringe to achieve the “bundles” of paint which I found captivating.  She also uses screen printing, much as Rauschenberg did, and I am very keen to try to do this myself but I have never done screen printing before.  Getting the image into the canvas is what I want to achieve. I was always impressed by a Degas portrait of a Young Woman, which actually comes out of the canvas, as though it resides inside the weave. It is a stunning portrait in my view.


I used paint straight from the tube and tape, string, sacking, syringed paint, smudged paint all on plain white A2 cartridge paper with limited collage.   
.

 

My third painting was influenced by Auberbach’s technique of applying thick paint and outlining with charcoal.  I am not quite sure how he achieved this because I found the charcoal built up a residue of paint and didn’t apply any charcoal.  I have used acrylic and he may have been using oil.  I am not sure that would have made much difference.  I waited until the paint was almost dry then cleaned up the charcoal and did it again and it seemed to work.
                                  
I have not used the depth of paint Auberbach uses in his work.

 The idea came from some pebbles in my garden which I photographed.  I used the photograph as reference to paint from and just popped out occasionally to have a closer look at the stones.  I have intensified the colours a bit, for more visual interest.  I like the idea of outlining or contouring as it is sometimes referred to, though in this case it was to accentuate the shadows.

 




The final picture in this series was going to be influenced by Gerhard Richter, but I went on to a video clip of his work at the Tate, which I had previously been to, to refresh my memory.  He had done a painting of 9/11 in which I was very disappointed.  In fact I had to look for it because it was small and insignificant.  In the video the narrator said Richter almost didn’t know what to say about the tragedy…what can you say?  I thought his style would have been ideal to depict one of the worst terrorist outrages of our time, but he chose to paint a relatively small painting, his choice of course.

The clip reminded me of one of the iconic image to come out of the tragedy which I had always felt was something I wanted to reproduce in paint, possibly in shades of grey, like Richter’s photograph paintings, but it turned out somewhat differently.


This was an acrylic base with oil on top.  I am a great fan of John Piper and I think it has elements of his work and possibly an Italian artist, whose name I can’t think of, as well as having echoes of Anselm Keifer's work.  Influences work at a sub-conscious level despite attempts to follow specific artists.  Our brains act like sponges and we carry images in our heads that influence our work without our knowing it sometimes.  In some ways I think this is a better way of proceeding along a path than merely copying ideas.  I was quite pleased with how this turned out although at the time it was difficult to bring it to a conclusion and I thought it was heading for the bin.

 
I have not used any extreme media in these paintings, like plaster and sand etc. because I felt the object of the exercise was to explore the paint texture rather than additives.  They will come later I feel sure.

 COMPOSITION
 

I had read some time ago a little book by Bernard Dunstan called Composing Your Painting.   Although I am now doing the Mixed Media section of the OCA course I thought I would look at the book again to see if any of the observations would apply to Abstract paintings and collage work. 

I paraphrase below some of the essential elements to good composition as outlined in the book and have concluded that regardless of whether the painting is a traditional representational picture or an abstract image, all the elements apply. The book doesn't mention texture very much, so I have added that myself.  I have given details of the book in the footnote in case other students viewing this page may be interested in obtaining a copy of the book.

  • Volumes, large and smaller ones balanced
  • Tone – Light against dark and vice versa
  • Golden Section
  • Linear framework – divisions in work by thirds, fifths, eighths etc.
  • Counter-change
  • Shapes in tonal areas to add interest
  • Use of colour to identify tone, small against large
  • Warm v Cool, warm in cool areas and cool in warm areas
  • Neutrals, i.e. greys, creams
  • Rhythm and movement through brushstrokes and texture
  • Static composition – symmetrical
  • Soft directional lines – les movement
  • Hard directional lines – more movement
  • Short directional lines connecting to others – more interesting
  • Right Angles and echoes locking and stabilizing effect or thrust and movement
  • Curved movement: energy; guiding eye left to right, place animal or human looking in a certain direction
  • Counter directions to add interest
  • Repetition: unity, movement
  • Lost and found lines
  • Texture, rough v smooth, tonal - ie visual
Composing your Painting by Bernard Dunstan, ISBN: 0289709032 Published by Cassell Limited 1979

Sunday, 11 August 2013

Physical Paint Texture - Research


PAINTING 2: Mixed Media
MIXED MEDIA

Part I TACTILE AND MULTIPLE SURFACES

Project: Physical Texture of Paint - Research

  

Rather than compare just two artists I wanted to explore those artist whom I have been inspired by because of their ‘voluptuous’ and dynamic use of paint.

I am effectively following a route from Van Gogh whose work, though not appreciated at the time, caused artists to realize the potential of the painting media in ways that had never been anticipated before.  Van Gogh, using brushes of various sizes - usually larger coarser hogss hair brushes, invented a world that explored the sensuous charm of nature.  His brush strokes gave life to what he painted through texture.  The thickness of the paint enabled him to express his emotional feel for the object before him.  His series of sunflowers, the over exposure of which has caused the image to become somewhat hackneyed, use a variety of mark making to convey the petals, leaves and central seed head.  His style did not only apply to objects he was able to give movement to the skies he produced, particularly with his Starry Night:



“The meaning lies inside the paint” is what Van Gogh said of his work, it wasn’t just the meaning is was the quality of the brush strokes which helped to determine the value of his work.

Van Gogh therefore uses texture to reinforce his emotional reaction to the natural world.  Interestingly he is a precursor to many styles, pointillism, abstraction, futurism. 
 
Another artist whose work incorporates texture in a similar way is indeed the Futurist Umberto Boccioni.  He effectively follows on from Van Gogh’s idea of using sweeping and swirling strokes to indicate movement, speed and also chaos and noise.    Boccioni is quoted as saying, similar to  Van Gogh, “…to let the viewer live in the midst of the picture…” is what he wanted to achieve.


 
Both artists used traditional canvas boards but hogshair larger brushes, were probably included in their equipment.

Whereas Van Gogh was exploring the natural world, Boccioni, who had been influenced by Munch, as well as Cubmism and Expressionism was using texture as a dynamic tool to establish a concept, the concept of movement and speed. He was particularly interested in the movement of the horse, it is  therefore ironic that he fell from his horse and subsequently died at only 33 years of age,  Another of those artists of whom we say, I wonder what else he would have produced had he lived.

Moving into the 20th Century the next artist I want to include is Jackson Pollock.  He is renowned for his drip paintings but before that he explored mystical works, sometimes influenced by Indian culture.  His use of tools and materials broadened the approach of artists to the availability of items which might be used in the production of works of art: house enamel, syringes, sticks, house paint brushes, palette knife and so on.  He used large canvases on the floor for his drip paintings but otherwise used conventional stretchers.

For Pollock the expression of mystical and psychological ideas were partly achieved by his use of paint which was tactile by way of an extension of himself.  He too, talked about wanting to actually be ‘ in the painting’

We can give these movements whatever titles we like Abstraction, Abstract Expressionism, Futurism, but I think with all three of these artists they are trying to bring something out of themselves and into the canvas they work on, the paint acts as an extension from themselves, a conduit if you like from the idea in their minds to the support, it is almost as though their very blood issues from their fingertips in the form of paint to produce the creative energy and dynamism they so want to achieve.

 

 

Moving on to contemporary artists, I want to include Gerhard Richter

One cannot but be impressed by the work of Richter, particularly his abstract paintings which use texture in an unusual way.  Effectively as an overpainting technique on large scale canvases using rollers, scrapers, trowels, brushes, palette knives and various other tools to produce these fascinating works.  He uses paint almost in an automatist way to convey images which project the internal, unpredetermined ideas which develop to a point which satisfies the artist, and fulfils some potential reality.  “Art is the highest form of hope” Richter says.  As a concept it is difficult to understand Richter’s rationale, suffice to say there are many different realities some of which we cannot know and I think Richter is attempting to materialize or hint at unknown potential realities, transcendentallly in the same way that Pollock was exploring those ideas, but with his feet on the ground.  Richter seems to want to reach out beyond knowledge to the realities that may or may not exist and which are intrinsically within his work, as he says “the secret is in the painting”, and it is realized through the painting method.
 

One of Richter’s pupils, Pia Fries is my next choice.  An emerging artist of the 21st century, Fries negates the idea of painting being dead and interred during the 1960s and 1970s by Conceptual, Performance, Installation arts.  Artists like Fries have invalidated this idea.  Painting on a wooden board with multi layers of primer Fries paints with palette knives, spatulas, syringes, industrial instruments and application objects she makes herself.  Much of the pristine white of the canvas is left, sometimes she silkscreens images on to the canvas then overpaints them with textures which form abstract piles of paint twisting, interweaving smudging and folding one colour into another almost like ethnic jewellery. Her work is said to explore the musical harmonies of musique concrete. It will be interesting to see her work develop.

http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://www.newyorkartworld.com/images-reviews02/afries/caspian-500x382.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.newyorkartworld.com/reviews/fries.html&h=382&w=500&sz=15&tbnid=JEJq5e7-TZ3sxM:&tbnh=94&tbnw=123&zoom=1&usg=__3tynBtMr_Jq4-hwFeucVjdxygkQ=&docid=Yf_3MrVPZRpHmM&sa=X&ei=hnkHUs_FEoG7Oe3GgFg&ved=0CMcBEP4dM
Aw

Futurism - Sylvia Martin, published by Tasken 2006, Modern Art, David Britt published by Thames & Hudson 1974, Van Gogh by Brian Petrie, published by Phaidon Press 1974, Wickipedia, Vitamin P, Phaidon Press 2002, Gerhard Richter Large Abstracts by Ulrich Wilmes, Hatie Cantz 2008
 

Tuesday, 23 July 2013

Sketchbook Jan-June 2013







HERMITAGE MUSEUM, St Petersburg

 Visit, September 2012

  

I was lucky enough to visit the above for a second time during September 2012, my first visit was in 1993.  Anyone who has been there will know that tour groups are strictly controlled.  However, I was able to explain to the guide that I had visited the Hermitage before and really only wanted to see the paintings and that I knew where the gallery was.  She very kindly permitted me to leave the group.  When I arrived in the gallery it was completely empty of visitors so I was able to view and photograph some 38 of the exhibits.


One of the paintings which I had seen illustrated many times was really exciting in it’s colour.  It was Winter Landscape by Wassily Kandinsky (1866-1944) painted in 1909.  The vividness of the colour made it look almost luminescent.  It seemed small, though measurements are given as 75.5 x 97.5 (29” x 38”)  This would have been a painting of snow yet the colours are vivid and there is virtually no white at all.  Blues, yellows, pinks and greens dominate the canvas.  It is interesting to see the beginnings of abstraction in the work.  The canvas is almost divided vertically into thirds within which areas one can almost see individual compositions.  These are divided again, on the right, by half horizontally and on the left almost into one third and two thirds.  The top left “square” again almost forms a picture in itself and becomes quite abstract.  A road with trees in the centre “third” is virtually the only element of perspective, most other areas are rendered flat. (you may need to paste the links into your browser)

 http://www.wassilykandinsky.net/ then search for Winter Landscape

   

Another work which indicates early signs of abstraction is The Luxembourg Gardens (2901) by Henri Matisse (1869-1954) 59.5 x 81.5cm (23” x 32”)

http://www.hermitagemuseum.org/fcgi-bin/db2www/quickSearch.mac/gallery?selLang=English&tmCond=Luxembourg+Gardens&go.x=12&go.y=10


Like the Kandinsky, there is a road leading into the picture, which again is more or less the only element of perspective in the picture.  The trees and shrubs are rendered fairly flat and the composition is almost abstract particularly on the right hand side.  Patches of colour are occasionally outlined but the whole composition is reliant on colour and colour relationships which are conceived in terms of contrasts.  The green on the right is contrasted with the red on the left.  The centre is a mixture of yellow/ blue, orange and purple.  The related purple/red of the overhanging branch in the middle ties everything together, and the colour is used sparingly in other parts of the painting and achieves the same stabilizing effect.  Colours are used almost arbitrarily in an abstract way to produce a design or composition that pleases the eye.  Thinking back to my research into colour and Edith Anderson Feisner’s book on Colour, the proportions used by Matisse are more or less equivalent, i.e. Yellow 4, Blue 9; Purple 8 Orange 3; Red 6, Green 6.  The tonal relationships are almost inverse to what one would expect with the distance being darker than the foreground, which eliminates perspective, as indeed abstraction does.  The objects become shapes on which to drape colour, not realist representations.

 I felt like a child in a sweet shop on the occasion of my visit and it was a sheer delight to view the gallery unhindered by other spectators.